To analyze ARIMA results, you need to determine if the model meets the assumptions using Jlung-Box chi-square statistics and autocorrelation of residuals; understand if each term is significant using p-values, and recognize if your model fits well using mean-squared error.
Table of Contents
- Understanding ARIMA Results
- 1. Review General Information
- 2. Determine Term Significance
- 3. Review Assumptions
- 4. Fit Analysis
- The Bottom Line
Understanding ARIMA Results
After creating an autoregressive model, it’s important to check the results to see if your model makes sense and how well it performs. When using statsmodels or any other library, it’ll print something out like the below.
The best way to understand is by example. We’ll review the results of a simple AR model trying to predict Bitcoin’s future results using these steps:
- Review general information
- Determine term significance
- Analyze model assumptions
- Compare models and improve fit
We’ll review every line item within each step so you’ll walk away having a crystal clear understanding of your results.
1. Review General Information
The first thing you want to do is review the general information.
Also, statsmodels uses the same module for all of the autoregressive models, which is why the header displays SARIMAX Results when your model may only be a vanilla autoregression.
SARIMAX stands for Seasonal AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average with eXogenous regressors.
The basic information is pretty self-explanatory:
- Dep. Variable - What we’re trying to predict.
- Model - The type of model we’re using. AR, MA, ARIMA.
- Date - The date we ran the model
- Time - The time the model finished
- Sample - The range of the data
- No. Observations - The number of observations
The dependent variable is the close, which is what we’re trying to predict. The independent variables the constant $%\beta $% the error term is sigma2, or $%\varepsilon $% in our equation above. The ar.L1, ar.L2, and ar.L3 are our lag variables.
After reviewing that we didn’t make any basic mistakes with our model, we can move onto the next step and analyze the term significance.
2. Determine Term Significance
We want to make sure each term in our model is statistically significant. The null for this section is that each coefficient is NOT statistically significant – therefore, we want each term to have a p-value of less than 0.05, so we can reject the null hypothesis.
In our example, all of the p-values are significant as they’re below the 0.05 threshold.
3. Review Assumptions
Next, we want to make sure our model meets the assumption that the residuals are independent, known as white noise.
If the residuals are not independent, we can extract out the non-randomness to make a better model.
The Ljung Box test, pronounced “Young” and sometimes called the modified Box-Pierce test, tests that the errors are white noise.
The Ljung-Box (L1) (Q) is the LBQ test statistic at lag 1 is , and the Prob(Q) is 0.01, and the p-value is 0.94. Since the probability is above 0.05, we can’t reject the null that the errors are white noise.
If you’re interested in seeing all of the Ljung-Box test statistics and p-values for the lags, you can use a Ljung-Box diagnostic function.
from statsmodels.stats.diagnostic import acorr_ljungbox mod = ARIMA(endog=train, order=order) res = mod.fit() jlung = acorr_ljungbox(res.resid)
Heteroscedasticity tests that the error residuals are homoscedastic or have the same variance. The summary performs White’s test. Our summary statistics show a test statistic of 1.64 and a p-value of 0.00, which means we reject the null hypothesis and our residuals show variance.
This variance poses forecasting problems, and if you don’t know why, this video is an excellent refresher on the topic.
Jarque-Bera tests for the normality of errors. It tests the null that the data is normally distributed against an alternative of another distribution. We see a test statistic of 4535.14 with a probability of 0, which means we reject the null hypothesis, and the data is not normally distributed. Also, as part of the Jarque-Bera test, we see the distribution has a slight negative skew and a large kurtosis.
4. Fit Analysis
The Log-Likelihood, AIC, BIC, and HQIC help compare one model with another.
The log-likelihood function identifies a distribution that fits best with the sampled data. While it’s useful, AIC and BIC punish the model for complexity, which helps make our ARIMA model parsimonious.
Akaike’s Information Criterion
Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) helps determine the strength of the linear regression model. The AIC penalizes a model for adding parameters since adding more parameters will always increase the maximum likelihood value.
Bayesian Information Criterion
Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), like the AIC, also punishes a model for complexity, but it also incorporates the number of rows in the data.
Hannan-Quinn Information Criterion
Hannan-Quinn Information Criterion (HQIC), like AIC and BIC is another criterion for model selection; however, it’s not used as often in practice.
The Bottom Line
It’s essential to understand how to analyze ARIMA results. In this post, you learned first to examine the general information, review the coefficients for significance, understand how to determine if our results meet the model assumptions, and then compare various models.
Subscribe to Analyzing Alpha
Exclusive email content that's full of value, void of hype, tailored to your interests whenever possible, never pushy, and always free.